Category Archives: Uncategorized

Blow to the Calcaneus

The Achilles heel of the wicked is their PRIDE. This their arrogance will ever result in the ultimate, spectacular frustration of their schemes, though they might prevail for a season. This is primarily because in the stench of their conceit they dare to scoff at and marginalize almighty God, as if He were not perpetually and intimately involved in all human affairs.

That heavenly involvement in our earthly arena accords with infinite understanding and is directed by an eternal purpose. It soars far above the finite understanding of the godly and the godless alike. As high as the Heavens are above the Earth, so are God’s ways and thoughts higher than our ways and thoughts.

On the part of the godly (who know Ephesians 6:11 and following) there is confident trust in a loving heavenly Father when circumstances appear grim and the wicked have the upper hand. On the part of the wicked, there is the foolish assumption that they will never be brought down, let alone be called to account by their righteous and holy Judge, as they revel in their unrighteous deceit and work to realize their unholy agendas.

“He who sits in the heavens shall laugh; the Lord shall hold them in derision.” (Psalm 2:4) They will fall into the pits they dug and be caught in their own snares. Their bullets will ricochet into their own hearts and their bombs explode in their own faces.


Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Limited Audience?

Anthropogenic climate change. Following is an endeavor to address that hot topic with cool reasoning.

First, and only for the sake of argument, let us grant that it is real. Only for the sake of argument, let us assume it is all true. Our production of energy and other human activities are dramatically changing the climate of the earth. In fact if unchecked those activities will destroy the earth! Therefore, humanity must act NOW to “save the planet.” We must all go green or face global gangrene, so to speak.

There are two groups of people yours truly invites to think through the implications of this generous assumption. Others are welcome as observers.

The first group consists of Biblical creationists, usually the object of the ridicule of the second group. We believe that the earth itself is only thousands, not billions of years old. We believe that the Creator formed all life including human life within days of the initial creation of the cosmos as a whole. And while affirming that the Creator equipped His amazingly diverse and wondrous biological marvels with a capacity for limited adaptation, we absolutely deny the never observed claims of Darwinistic evolution.

We also believe that immediately after the global flood so well evidenced by the fossil record, reflected in the ancient folklore of nations all over the world, and accurately documented in the same Bible from which we derive our cosmogony, God gave all mankind a very specific promise about the earth and its climate. This promise can be found at Genesis 8:21,22.

The second group consists of those who are philosophically naturalists. According to them, the galaxies with their innumerable stars, all the planets and other celestial bodies are merely the detritus of some big bang. And as Crosby, Stills, Nash, and Young sang about us people, “We are stardust, we are golden, we are billion year old carbon.” Life arose when natural forces and inanimate matter interacted on one tiny piece of that cosmic detritus, the earth. All life observed today has evolved by chance after, in some proposed primordial pond, lightning sparked a hypothetical reaction which neither Victor Frankenstein nor any real scientist can duplicate in the laboratory. Molecules to man summarizes billions of years of prehistory…goo to you by way of the zoo. *

So most of these folk obviously and vigorously deny divine creation and the existence of supernatural or spiritual realities. Others among them grudgingly admit that a supernatural realm might exist, but just as vigorously insist that any claim to knowledge of it has no place in the labors of what they consider to be enlightened science. As renowned geneticist and evolutionary biologist Professor R. Lewontin puts it, “…we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.” **

Let’s bring this back to anthropogenic climate change and the assumption we granted for the sake of argument, namely that it is real. How do our two groups respond to it?

Without apology the Biblical creationist affirms that the absolutely sovereign, promise keeping Lord God will never permit the utter annihilation of the earth (Aside: that would include by nuclear warfare). This does NOT mean we are indifferent to reckless waste disposal, accidental oil spills, or the squandering of resources. It means that we regard the latter as just that: resources which Providence has given for human use! We subsume the concerns of what once was called conservationism under greater concerns: the glory of our God and the welfare of our neighbors.

For example, we regard Draconian restrictions on industrial development, established in hopes of achieving a theoretical and negligible change in the average global temperature, as very bad. We calculate the negative economic impact they have on millions of our fellow men and women and say NO. Biblicly regarding the human race as the divinely appointed steward of the Earth, we want to see fossil fuel reserves (think offshore drilling, coal deposits, etc.) responsibly developed for human benefit, not neglected on account of climate change hysteria.

Now to our second group. First, let us ask them why must the planet be saved? When denying the Creator, recognition of the transcendent ethical realities of good and evil cannot be maintained consistently. (Emphasis on consistently; this writer realizes that weak efforts to attain such consistency have been made.) So why is it “good” to save the planet? What is good and what is evil? Questions easily brushed off for the moment as beyond the scope of this discussion but unavoidable in the long run…

If the earth is to be destroyed and humanity with it, so what? If eternal extinction is the ultimate destiny of the human race and all life, your efforts to restrain anthropogenic climate change are ultimately pointless. Save the planet for what? If the inevitable heat death of the universe is the grand finale, are you not merely rearranging the deck furniture on the Titanic of history?

Your crusade is nothing more than a pragmatism that accords with your subjective aspirations. By what imperative do you insist that other people – i.e. other bags of biochemical activity descended from the first bit of protoplasm which was jump started in that primordial pond – get on board with your agenda?

You commonly attribute amazing powers to this mysterious process you call evolution. Contrary to all that can be soberly observed about the deleterious effects of mutation, you affirm that on account of it life forms are ever becoming more complex. OK, so what if humanity’s evolution into a life form able to make machines that emit tons of hydrocarbons and dreadful weapons of mass destruction eventuates in the extinction of life forms less fit to survive in that environment? Isn’t that the very nature of evolution by natural selection? So what if whales and pachyderms and polar bears go extinct? Hey, they just didn’t make natural selection’s cut! Tough keratin outgrowth from the tips of mammalian digits!

This writer will go on recycling aluminum and plastic, using energy frugally, and hoping future generations will be able to see living elephants. And he will pray to the God of the Bible against the metastasizing of hysteria and pseudo science, and for the advance of the kingdom of the Lord Jesus Christ, Prince of peace.

* title of book by Harold Hill

* *

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Deeper State?

According to the historically accurate usage of the term, Iran is not a theocracy. It could be called an “allah-cracy,” and one which appears to be dissolving at present. It is an allah-cracy and not a theocracy because as an Islamic republic it does not honor the God of the Bible. Let me explain…

Iran and other Muslim nations were not founded to revere the THEOS from Whose name (in the Greek new testament, written early in the first Christian century) the term THEO-cracy is derived. Instead, the so-called republic of Iran, ideologically antagonistic to Christianity and other religions, honors its god Allah presented in the Koran of Muhammad who died in June of the seventh Christian century.

The former Soviet Union, which existed for about seven decades of the twentieth Christian century, might be described as an “a-theocracy.” It was a state founded upon a-theistic, Marxist ideology – also consciously opposed to Christianity. That bump in the road of humanity’s annals (like other a-theistic, communist states which have come and gone to no one’s sorrow) was built not on the Rock of ages, but on utopian sand.

ANCIENT Israel – think Moses, the prophets, and David – was indeed a theocracy. It was established on earth by them and other servants of the God of the old testament, Who is the same new testament THEOS referenced above. Even that state failed! Yet throughout its existence the earnest expectation of its faithful citizens was for the coming of the unfailing, eternal kingdom of God.

One of those faithful citizens, the prophet Malachi, predicted the time when the very King of that heavenly kingdom would come into His earthly temple. When He did so c. A.D. 26 He was heralded by John the Baptizer. Both the herald and the King Himself preached the same thrilling message: “the kingdom of heaven is at hand!”

And so as the prophet Daniel had predicted c. 600 B.C., that kingdom came with power in the days of the Roman empire. After accomplishing the earthly part of His Messianic mission through His unlawful execution by the soldiers of Tiberius Caesar and His bodily resurrection from the dead to which hundreds of eye-witnesses testified, the King ascended victoriously into heaven.

From that place of supreme exaltation, and though He is presently unseen, He rules over all. The glorious reality which Daniel and all the old testament writers foresaw and foreshadowed is writ large and with crisp clarity in the new testament of the God of Abraham…of Job…of Noah…of Enoch, Seth, Abel, and of Adam and Eve the first parents of all mankind, who all are now invited by the King to His everlasting banquet.

And what did King Jesus command His subjects, whom He loved unto death? He told them to pray to His Father and their Father thus: “Your Kingdom Come!” Now alive forevermore, having all power in heaven and earth, He their good Shepherd King continues to love His subjects, cherishing them as His younger brothers and sisters. He has commanded us to make disciples of all nations by the power of His Gospel, proclaimed in the power of the Holy Spirit, the Spirit of the Father and the Son.

And so like the mustard seed of His parable which grew into a great tree, that divine kingdom came, is coming, and will have no end. It continues to fill the earth by the peaceful yet inexorably prevailing power of the Prince of peace, displacing rivals without blood reddened swords or any modern equivalents. Like that plant in the parable, birds now nest in its branches. That is to say, temporal earthly kingdoms derive protection and benefit from its abiding presence and strength.

When nations reject the King of king and Lord of lords they are held in derision by Him. He sits in the heavens and laughs at them! They find only frustration, confusion, and failure. When they humbly “kiss the Son” (Psalm 2) they find blessing, prosperity, and peace.

Yes Lord! Your kingdom come, Your will be done on earth as it is in heaven!

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Celebrating According to Knowledge

It is the author’s hope that this argument regarding the observation of Christmas will provide Biblical guidance for Christians concerned about the issue of “holidays”…

True or false: According to the Bible, three wise kings who had traveled from distant lands in the east, led by a miraculous star, arrived at an inn’s stable in Bethlehem on the night of Jesus’ birth to worship Him.

Many have never questioned this scenario from Christmas tradition, and singing beloved carols like “We Three Kings of Orient Are” has helped popularize it, but the correct answer is…FALSE!

This writer is not a “demythologizer”, i.e. one who wants to strip the supernatural out of the Bible. On the contrary – at Christ’s entry to this world some two thousand years ago, the paranormal abounded! Heaven’s intervention into earth’s routine was explosive! In the first place, God Almighty was revealed in the flesh, incarnate as a Human Being. God humbled Himself to be born, lovingly gazed upon, and held as an Infant. On that wondrous night in the little town of Bethlehem, a great company of “extraterrestrial” beings that are normally invisible (angels) appeared to shepherds in the area and announced to them the amazing Birth of the Savior of the world with joyful, celestial song.

Moreover, wise men (magi) from the east, led indeed by a supernatural star, did eventually come to see the Christ Child. However, they visited the Child in a house, where they worshiped Him and gave gifts. The magi are never named, and there may have been two, five, or a dozen of them. The Bible gives no indication that they were kings, and they were all apparently from one nation. Finally, their visit was approximately two years after Jesus’ birth. (See Matthew 2:11, 12)

Why burst December’s red and green balloons? Why be a theologically exacting Scrooge? Isn’t our real fight against the commercialization and secularization of one of Christendom’s most holy days?

Those questions beg a more fundamental one: Should the nativity of Christ be observed in a religious way at all? Should *December 25th be “one of Christendom’s most holy days”?

A true Christian recognizes the holy Bible, the books of the Old and New Testaments, as the very Word of God, and hence as his or her highest authority in all things. A good place to begin seeking a Biblical answer to this question about Christmas is from the words of Jesus Himself. The only time Jesus mentioned his own birth was when He stood before Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor under whom He died:

Pilate therefore said to Him, “Are You a king then?” Jesus answered, “You say rightly that I am a king. For this cause I was born, and for this cause I have come into the world, that I should bear witness to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth hears My voice.” (John 18:37)

It was not his birth, but the death which He suffered under Pilate that Christ wanted His followers to observe. For this reason, He ordained that in remembrance of Him, believers partake of the cup and bread we call Communion, or the Lord’s Supper.

Other than the first day of every week, the Lord’s day or the New Covenant sabbath (Sunday), one will peruse the New Testament in vain seeking for the establishment of any Christian holy days at all – by Christ, or by the men He commissioned to speak with His full authority in that foundational age of the New Covenant Church, the apostles. Palm Sunday, Good Friday, Easter, Christmas and the religious rituals and customs associated with them all exist because of traditions that originated outside of the Bible.

The problem the Church has found with such extra-Biblical religious traditions is that they can be like big government. They grow and grow and become more and more ornate and filled with man made rules. What was intended to adorn eventually obscures the profound simplicity of Divine realities. The Saint Nicholas legend (which has a basis in reality) was once promoted, no doubt, to illustrate the grace of generous giving. “God so loved the world, that He GAVE His only begotten Son…”, John 3:16. “It is more blessed to GIVE than to receive”, said Jesus (Acts 20:35). What does Santa do today? It seems to this writer that – with a jolly ho, ho, ho – he too often allows the greedy spirit of “GIMME, GIMME” to become respectable, and usurps the central place which Christ should have when we allegedly celebrate His *birthday!

Are we then to leave the ornaments in storage, let stockings be for wearing only, regard Rudolph as just another road kill victim, and sanctimoniously disdain an international and cross-denominational feast that stands for cheer and goodwill? Don’t touch that Yule Log channel! Stay tuned…

This article was originally published in two parts (December 3rd and 10th, 1998) in a newspaper local to the Flemington, NJ area of Locktown Church, “The Hunterdon County Democrat”. Part two follows…

Dreidel, dreidel, dreidel
I made it out of clay
And when it’s dry and ready
With dreidel I will play!

These lines are from a children’s song about a simple, traditional toy associated with Hanukkah, the festival of lights. With that Jewish holiday as a starting point, we will resume our discussion, “Should Christians celebrate Christmas”?

Hanukkah predates Christmas by centuries. It is a religious feast commemorating the dedication of a new altar and the eviction of idols from God’s temple, under the leadership of the heroic Judas Maccabeus in 165 B.C. One can read the stirring account in the apocryphal book of 1 Maccabees, chapter 4.

We also read, in canonical Scripture, that Jesus Christ honored this feast by His attendance: “…And it was at Jerusalem the feast of the dedication, and it was winter. And Jesus walked in the temple in Solomon’s porch.” (John 10:22, 23)

Jesus of Nazareth in Galilee evidently traveled to Jerusalem for a first century Hanukkah, even as He had attended the Passover from His youth onward (Luke 2:41; 22:11-15, et. al.) This bears on our discussion because, unlike the Passover (the greatest of feasts under the Old Covenant), the feast of the dedication was not Divinely commanded. In this respect Hanukkah is like the historically younger holiday, Christmas. Both holidays are among those “traditions that originated outside of the Bible.”

Let’s put it another way. In the Old Testament, the temple, its form of worship, and content of worship were all ordained by God. A feast recognizing the re-dedication of the temple after its blasphemous desecration by Antiochus Epiphanes was not ordained by God. According to the New Testament, the Christ Who called His body a temple (John 2:19-21) was miraculously born by the power of God. However, no holy anniversary recognition of His birth was ordained by God.

Although we are not told expressly in the Bible just HOW Jesus celebrated the feast of the dedication, we can draw principles from His example and teachings in the Gospels to help answer the question, “Should Christians Celebrate Christmas?”

First we know that Christ Jesus, being both the Herald and Substance of the kingdom of God, delighted in spiritual pursuits. His meat and drink was to please His heavenly Father. His true disciples also know, as the apostle Paul put it, that “…the kingdom of God is not eating and drinking, but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit” (Romans 14:17). The bells and tinsel world, its decked halls, its vain attractions, and all its gaudy commercialism could not choke off Jesus’ vigorous spiritual affections – because His heart and mind were centered on heavenly things. As He Himself said, “…where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.” (Matthew 6:21)

On the other hand, Jesus preached against allowing man-made religious traditions to obscure the true worship of God (Mark 7:6-8). Whatever others may have been doing at the feast of the dedication, Jesus was walking in the very temple that had been dedicated! In John chapter 4, Jesus told the woman at the well that God seeks worshipers who will worship Him in Spirit and in truth. Dead formalism, encrusted with vain traditions, has no place under the New Covenant. Truly Christian worship is worship in the living Holy Spirit. And whatever is not known with certainty to be true (such as the common misconceptions about the visit of the magi, previously noted) is not made a part of Divine worship by way of inward conceptualizations, hymn lyrics, images, religious props, etc.

Finally, Jesus always was able to skillfully direct the attention of the wayward, the complacent, and even those who made themselves His adversaries toward what matters for eternity: one’s relationship with God. The Yuletide season is one when people rarely seen at places of worship do join in with “the regular churchgoers”. It is a time when those who joyfully know, love, and follow the Lamb of God, born long ago in Bethlehem, can winsomely direct the attention of others toward the gracious Savior, Whose birthday ostensibly is being remembered globally on December 25.

Should we Christians celebrate Christmas? As long as we do so according to these and other principles derived from Jesus’ example and teachings as they are found in the holy Bible, YES: let’s keep this feast!

* It should be noted that the date of Christ’s birth is not known. Many statements in the Gospels involve dates and periods of time. For example, the crucifixion was just before Passover. Comparing these statements has led some to conclude that Jesus’ birthday is probably in our September. Sorry, no “winter wonderland” Nativity! The climate in Bethlehem precludes snow even in winter months…

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Sanctuary Nation

President Abraham Lincoln began his Gettysburg address with reference to an historically unique event. He reminded his hearers that it was merely one long lifetime past that a NEW NATION was brought forth in this old world. He said that this new nation was conceived in liberty. He referred to one of the propositions to which the newborn U.S.A. was dedicated: that all men are created equal.

Granted, the outworking of that proposition had led to a more recent, bloody unpleasantness and to the existence of the cemetery which Lincoln was dedicating on that November Thursday, four score and seven years into the young nation’s life. The struggle to bring liberty and justice for all out of abstraction and tangibly into all American lives goes on. The national effort to honor the proposition that all human beings are created equal continues.

Despite that struggle and despite the grievous corruption which infects whatsoever comes to pass in the course of human events, this unique and exceptional republic still stands…yes, the star spangled banner still waves.

The newness of the American nation consisted in much more than its youth as nations go. From its founding onward, America was never the name of a people who share kinship, as the term “nation” ever had denoted. Before that Declaration of Independence which is the bedrock of the U.S. Constitution, the world had seen empires rise and fall. Strategic alliances had surely existed before the 1776th year of grace. Political borders such as the Korean peninsula’s DMZ have been drawn and erased since ancient times.

Our 16th president was affirming that our nation is radically innovative to the core: we are a people united by ideas, not bloodlines. E Pluribus Unum (out of many, one) is our motto. America was established as a nation over which neither Britain’s King George III nor any other mere mortal would be sovereign. It was to be a nation in which the caprice of Rex Lex (the king is the law) would be displaced by Lex Rex (the law is king). The rule of law is to be sacred from sea to shining sea, and in that beautiful pearl in the midst of our westerly ocean.

These founding ideas in turn have an historical basis. And that brings us to the issue at hand, sanctuary.

America was not founded as a theocracy. And despite the efforts of those who would edit history and engineer society, neither was it founded as a theophobic, secular entity. It is beyond controversy that the matrix of national conception to which Mr. Lincoln alluded was that of Biblical a.k.a. Judeo-Christan ethics. It cannot be denied that the proposition all men are created equal (not evolved from primordial slime) comes directly from the Bible and its teaching that every man and woman shares in the glorious, equalizing dignity of bearing the Imago Dei, the image of God.

For the sake of us who live over twelve score years after the founding of the U.S.A., here is an effort to bring back stabilizing, salutary Biblical ethics and anthropology which some would reject as anachronistic or worse. Here is a challenge to those who imagine themselves as neo-revolutionaries but who can only offer invertebrate moral relativism as a foundation for the society of which they dream; a society with all the longevity of a sand castle built below the high tide mark. Hear the word of God:

“There is to be one law and one ordinance for you and for the alien who sojourns with you.” (Numbers 15:16)

“…you shall select for yourselves cities to be your cities of refuge, that the manslayer who has killed any person unintentionally may flee there…these six cities shall be for refuge for the sons of Israel, and for the alien and for the sojourner among them; that anyone who kills a person unintentionally may flee there.” (Numbers 35:11, 15)

“If, however, a man acts presumptuously toward his neighbor, so as to kill him craftily, you are to take him even from My altar, that he may die.” (Exodus 21:14)

“…the congregation shall judge between the slayer and the blood avenger according to these ordinances.” (Numbers 35:24)

Let’s compare this sublime wisdom about cities of refuge with the San Francisco treat which apparently has displaced Rice-a-Roni, namely the folly of being a so-called sanctuary city. First we note that according to both Scripture and ‘Frisco, special havens should exist. They are a good thing for the public welfare.

The agreement ends there. The alien or sojourner in view in Mosaic Law was someone who had entered the theocratic society peacefully and lawfully. The city that left its own heart who-knows-where embraces criminals as well as law abiding visa holders and those who aspire to citizenship. The Biblical city of refuge was a temporary haven. California’s city by the bay knows no such time limitation.

The Bible indeed insists on one law for citizen and sojourner. The town where little cable cars climb gives preferential treatment to aliens and cares little to nothing for the rights of American citizens. The golden Scriptural standard requires careful examination of each case. The city of the Golden Gate bridge wants to make sure that the outcome of litigation accords with identity politics. Mercy pervades God’s Law; the incisive distinction between manslaughter and murder itself originates there. But unlike the laxity which characterizes the sanctuary city mentality, God’s law also demands swift and rigorous punishment of the guilty.

So a BIG question remains for those who want to reject the world view, ethics, and jurisprudence of the Bible. Since the laws of our unique, exceptional nation find their origin and wisdom there, BY WHAT ALTERNATE STANDARD shall the nation legislate, judge, live and endure for the next twelve score years or more?

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Meditation on Galatians 2:20

The Galatians had heard and believed the gospel of God’s free gift of righteousness by faith, but false teaching had bewitched them. Having begun in the Spirit of the Christ Who justifies by grace through faith in Himself, they were deceived into believing they should continue to grow in holiness by their unprofitable, fleshly selves. And so the apostle taught them thus:

I have been crucified with Christ.
It is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me.
And the life which I now live in the flesh,
I live by faith in the Son of God,
Who loved me and gave Himself for me.

We might expound on that verse this way:

I have been crucified with Christ.
It is no longer self will that rules, but God’s good and perfect will.
And the things which I now determine to do in the flesh
I purpose according to faith in Him Whose food was to obey His Father,
Who loved me and set His face toward the cross for me.

I have been crucified with Christ.
It is no longer according to the fleshly mind of enmity against God,
but according to the mind of Christ that I think.
This transformation by the mind’s renewal is by faith in the Word Incarnate,
Who loved me and thought it a small thing to humble Himself for me.

I have been crucified with Christ.
It is no longer fleshly lusts and affections that motivate, but Godly ones
And the desires and feelings I now have in the flesh,
Flow from the new heart promised under the New Covenant, enacted
In His blood Who loved me and became a Man of Sorrows for me.

I have been crucified with Christ.
It is no longer with the stuff of this world that I provide myself,
But God supplies all my needs according to His riches in glory in Christ Jesus.
And all this provision is by faith in Him Who had nowhere to lay His head,
Who loved me and both hungered and made Himself poor for me.

I have been crucified with Christ.
My schedule no longer prevails, but His Who came in time’s fulness
And I redeem the remaining hours in the flesh
Through faith in the One Whose goings forth are from everlasting,
Who loved me and spent His earthly days for me.

I have been crucified with Christ.
It is no longer in the flesh that I glory, but in Jesus the Lord of glory
And the approval, recognition, and honor which I now seek in the flesh
Is that which comes from God, and is sought by faith in the Scorned One,
Who loved me and made Himself of no reputation for me.

I have been crucified with Christ.
It is no longer in the arm of flesh that I confide,
But in the One Who said “believe in God, believe also in Me”.
And the assurance I now know in the flesh
Is in accordance with the promise to believers in the Son of God,
Who loved me and entrusted His soul to His Father for me.

I have been crucified with Christ.
It is no longer on anything in the flesh that I set my hope
But on partaking in that glorious mystery, “Christ in you, the hope of glory”.
And this blessed hope in which I now rejoice with a joy unspeakable,
Is according to faith in the coming Son of Man,
Who loved me and will on that day conform me perfectly to Him.

I have been crucified with Christ.
It is no longer the sounding brass or tinkling cymbal of self
But the love of God shed abroad in this poor heart of flesh,
And the treasure now carried in this earthen vessel
IS the very life of the One Whose name is sacrificial Love.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Those Inward Nooks and Crannies

How often do we Christians miss out regarding communion with God…how many are those little ways in which even His children, caving to the sinful nature, try to hide from Him like Adam and Eve in Eden?

“Pray without ceasing,” wrote the inspired apostle to the Thessalonians. Do I take every possible occasion to express an holy aspiration, or make intercession for someone in need, or praise the holy One directly? Or do I merely talk about God here and there when I have a spare moment?

Do I perpetually speak to my heavenly Father through the mediation of Jesus His only begotten Son as one who is a spiritually regenerate partaker of the blessed Holy Spirit? Are my “God pronouns” mostly third person ones (He, Him, His) or second person ones (You, Your)?

In yet other words when gazing at an overwhelmingly gorgeous sky (day or night, clear or cloudy) do I say inwardly, “Yes, it’s true, the heavens declare the glory of God,” as if the great Artist my Redeemer were not right there? Or, as recognizing the faithful, upholding presence of Him Who is in need of nothing yet Who graciously seeks insignificant me do I say to Him, “Yes my precious Lord, the heavens indeed declare Your glory!”

Mere semantics? Perhaps. But…”O Lord, we know that You have said, ‘give me your heart.’ Wonderfully, it is both for Your glory and for our own highest delight that You have commanded us to love You with all our heart, soul, strength, and mind.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized